When a short visit to Korea with your child may become a permanent move — what protects you, what can be used against you, and what to do first.
Where are you now?
We have represented both the parent seeking a child's return (the applicant) and the parent asked to return the child (the respondent) in Hague Convention return cases. Below are the first pages of two Seoul Family Court decisions, with personal information redacted.
Whether a return is ordered often turns on the points discussed on this page, such as consent to the trip and how much time has passed. See also International Child Abduction (Hague Convention).


Outcomes depend on the facts and evidence of each case.
For couples living abroad, marital conflict or separation can lead one parent to return to Korea with the child "for a while". What one parent sees as a temporary visit can be turned, unilaterally, into a permanent move by the other — often followed by divorce and custody proceedings in a Korean court.
Once that happens, the left-behind parent is litigating in a foreign legal system, in a foreign language, against a spouse who may already have taken legal advice. Because the consequences for the child and for parental rights are serious, it pays to prepare before the trip, not after the return date has passed.
In one case, a wife living abroad with her husband returned to Korea with their children for what he understood to be a temporary stay. She then filed for divorce and custody in Korea and refused to bring the children back. The husband applied for their return under the Hague Convention, but the Korean court dismissed the application: it found that he had consented to the children staying in Korea, so the removal was not wrongful.
The evidence against him was his own cooperation. He had bought the round-trip airline tickets and kept sending living expenses — conduct later presented as proof that the move happened "with the consent of the parent".
“The court may dismiss a return application … where the person caring for the child … consented to or subsequently acquiesced in the removal or retention.”
Hague Convention Implementation Act, Article 12(4)(ii) (summary translation)
Even if a trip is meant as a short visit, without a clear written agreement a court can read it as permission for a permanent move.
Conduct that is often argued as consent
Buying the tickets or approving the travel without a fixed return date stated in writing.
Regular payments for school, housing or living costs in Korea, with no objection to the child remaining there.
Letting the return date pass without a clear written objection, or messages that sound like agreement.
Legal basis: Hague Convention Implementation Act, Articles 11 and 12(4).
Forum shopping means choosing the court most likely to give a favourable result. In international divorce, one spouse often files quickly in their home country's courts, where the language, the procedure and the practice are familiar.
Korean courts have jurisdiction over custody where the child's habitual residence is in Korea, or where one parent and the child are Korean nationals (Act on Private International Law, Article 59). Once a court in one country has taken up the case, litigating the same issues elsewhere becomes much harder, and the parent who filed first gains a real procedural advantage.
In the case above, the wife filed for divorce and custody in Korea first, establishing the Korean court's jurisdiction, and the husband's later Hague application failed. A defeated return application combined with an early filing in Korea is a pattern we see repeatedly in international divorce disputes.
The purpose, the return date, and that you do not agree to the child living in Korea. A short exchange both parents sign or confirm by email is far better than nothing.
School enrolment, medical records, the lease, activities — anything showing where the child's life is based.
Tickets and support payments can be reasons not to return the child. How and on what terms you pay can be structured to avoid that.
A clear, prompt objection helps rebut any later claim of acquiescence.
A Hague return application can be made through the central authority or directly to the Seoul Family Court. Delay strengthens the argument that the child has settled.
Criminal law. Abducting a minor is punishable by up to 10 years' imprisonment, and abducting a person to take them out of Korea by 2 to 15 years (Criminal Act, Articles 287 and 288(3)). But the Supreme Court held, en banc, that a parent who had been caring for the child and took the child abroad without violence, threats or unlawful force did not commit abduction (Supreme Court Decision 2010Do14328, 20 June 2013). In practice, a criminal complaint rarely stops or reverses a relocation.
Pre-trial orders. Once a family case is filed, the court can order a party not to change the current situation or can make orders for the child's care (Family Litigation Act, Article 62). These orders are not directly enforceable, and a breach leads to a fine of up to KRW 10 million (Article 67). Orders to surrender a passport or ban departure are not currently made on this basis.
Hague return. A return application is the main remedy when a child has been wrongfully removed to or kept in Korea, and Korean courts can enforce return orders, with detention of up to 30 days for a parent who still refuses (Hague Convention Implementation Act, Article 13). But the grounds for refusal — consent, acquiescence, settlement after one year — are exactly where preparation, or its absence, decides the case.
Legal basis: Criminal Act, Articles 287 and 288(3); Family Litigation Act, Articles 62 and 67; Hague Convention Implementation Act, Articles 12 and 13.
Related pages

Education: Yonsei University, Department of Physics · Languages: Korean, English · Press coverage (Naver News, Korean)
Certifications and awards









Reviewed by Pyoung-ho Kim, Attorney at Law · Last updated 8 November 2026
Tell us briefly where you, the other parent and the child normally live, what was agreed about the trip, and what has happened since. Our team replies to initial inquiries in English and, where the matter calls for it, arranges a consultation with a Korean lawyer. If a return date has already passed, please write today.